/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12528908

73KiB, 814x456, 1603682241287.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Let's talk about SEX - /sci/ Analysis - Sex - Which paper had it right?

Anonymous Thu 31 Dec 14:15:25 2020 No.12528908 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12528911 >>12528924 >>12528944

https://twitter.com/SwipeWright/status/1344045443223699456?s=20

Discuss with /sci/ level wit, passion and logic, these 2 papers.

What can we learn?
Who has the more valid scientific evidence?
What conclusions can we draw?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Dec 2020 14:17:11 No.12528911 Report

Quoted By: >>12528913

>>12528908
>brains / neuroscience
>statistics
>sociology
faggot shit, not science or math

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Dec 2020 14:18:06 No.12528913 Report

Quoted By:

>>12528911
https://twitter.com/SwipeWright/status/1100842757227200517?s=20

Sex is science
Neuroscience is based
Read

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Dec 2020 14:20:39 No.12528924 Report

Quoted By: >>12528932 >>12528941

>>12528908
>the metric of how well a scientific paper performs is now the amount of retweets and r*ddit mentions
the ABSOLUTE STATE of this clown world

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Dec 2020 14:22:13 No.12528932 Report

Quoted By:

>>12528924
Sadly he is pointing out how such editors of publications may bury uncomfortable science and promote science that has been peer-reviewed and superseded, solely to appear in line with social trends.

Hence the debate around the demarcation of sex and it's empirical influence is being politicized

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Dec 2020 14:23:56 No.12528941 Report

Quoted By:

>>12528924
>Some debate that seeps into public consciousness via social media.

>The science says this - PROMOTED
But actually on reflection
>The science doesn't say this because you never read the better valid critique that was not publicized because something something politically correct

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Dec 2020 14:24:57 No.12528944 Report

Quoted By: >>12529019

>>12528908
neither paper because you can't draw conclusions from a single paper (in the social sciences and medicine), you need a wealth of evidence, retrials, etc.
however there is a wealth of evidence which supports the hypothesis that there are sex differences in the structure of the human brain

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Dec 2020 14:40:30 No.12528979 Report

Quoted By: >>12529019 >>12529021

Discarding logic is logically compromising yourself.
If inconsistent studies are mass adopted by societies, those societies will fall. Simple as.
Just be aware of that and stand as far as possible from the clown tower when it collapses.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Dec 2020 14:59:10 No.12529019 Report

Quoted By:

>>12528944
>>12528979
based /sci/

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 31 Dec 2020 15:00:13 No.12529021 Report

Quoted By:

>>12528979
>Just be aware of that and stand as far as possible from the clown tower when it collapses.

Tips for this?

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches