>>12524939That doesn't make much sense to be honest (not to mention what the heck social harm means, doesn't police and the like prefer people being on opiates/opioids than amphetamines as the latter doesn't tend to be at home) also why does acetylated morphine has such an extreme spike while the opioid Buprenorphine barely moves anywhere despite being an opioid (and a very shitty and filthy drug overall that just has a synthetic bad feeling over it while being bad as a pain relief, it's just worthless in every sense of the word) not to mention also Methadone being that low (not saying that opiates or opioids really are as addictive as people tend to say) also what the heck is street methadone it is the same substance and all of it comes from government programs as well as all the buprenorphine so what is street about it?
Different amphetamines at widely different levels while the one being objectively more neurotoxic actually being put lower at physical harm while metylphenidate which kind of works closer to cocaine than to regular amphetamine not being put close to any of them.
Also how the heck can you accurately portray Barbiturates seeing as very few are available to the public these days or are they just pulling data out of their ass or using ancient data that probably wasn't correct to begin with (yes I am still irritated that barbiturates is kill and bensodiazepines slowly also going the way of the dodo)?
Why does it seem that this is just plain bullshit by people that have basically not read anything about the things named and especially sure don't have any personal experience or experiments if you will from them whatsoever...
