Actual brainlet here, check my sick schizo theory.
Time is an emergent property of 3D space travelling with a constant velocity (what we call speed of light) in a higher dimension. The "friction" against this higher-dimensional "medium" is slowing matter down and is responsible for the emergence of mass.
Massless particles do not experience time because they don't interact with anything. By moving in the opposite direction of the movement of space within higher-dimensional "medium", from the perspective of the latter they are essentially standing still. As soon as they collide or interact with something, they are "nudged" slightly against the "medium" which makes them no longer travel at the speed of light (and no longer be massless) for a limited duration.
You can't appear to go faster than the speed of light within our 3D space because if you could, you would GAIN mass as a result of relative motion against the "medium" (now in the opposite direction), and you need to LOSE mass to appear faster. This impossibility of "faster than the speed of light" is equivalent to the impossibility of "stiller than absolute stillness". In fact, depending on frame of reference, these two statements describe exactly the same thing.
However, "moving faster" than the speed of light IS possible in higher-dimensional medium. As stated previously, by going faster than the speed of light you GAIN mass because you start moving relative to the "medium", but in the opposite direction, which is exactly what antimatter is doing.
Matter-antimatter annihilation is simply their speeds cancelling out and becoming equal to speed of light – zero.
Why is there more matter than antimatter? Because our 3D space travels uniformly with a constant velocity as a single unified object – everything around us moves in the same direction through the "medium", so we perceive it as matter. Outside of our moving "bubble", however, nothing stops arbitrarily large quantities of "antimatter" from existing.
Time is an emergent property of 3D space travelling with a constant velocity (what we call speed of light) in a higher dimension. The "friction" against this higher-dimensional "medium" is slowing matter down and is responsible for the emergence of mass.
Massless particles do not experience time because they don't interact with anything. By moving in the opposite direction of the movement of space within higher-dimensional "medium", from the perspective of the latter they are essentially standing still. As soon as they collide or interact with something, they are "nudged" slightly against the "medium" which makes them no longer travel at the speed of light (and no longer be massless) for a limited duration.
You can't appear to go faster than the speed of light within our 3D space because if you could, you would GAIN mass as a result of relative motion against the "medium" (now in the opposite direction), and you need to LOSE mass to appear faster. This impossibility of "faster than the speed of light" is equivalent to the impossibility of "stiller than absolute stillness". In fact, depending on frame of reference, these two statements describe exactly the same thing.
However, "moving faster" than the speed of light IS possible in higher-dimensional medium. As stated previously, by going faster than the speed of light you GAIN mass because you start moving relative to the "medium", but in the opposite direction, which is exactly what antimatter is doing.
Matter-antimatter annihilation is simply their speeds cancelling out and becoming equal to speed of light – zero.
Why is there more matter than antimatter? Because our 3D space travels uniformly with a constant velocity as a single unified object – everything around us moves in the same direction through the "medium", so we perceive it as matter. Outside of our moving "bubble", however, nothing stops arbitrarily large quantities of "antimatter" from existing.
