>>12515807>>12515811You're not making sense dude. Look, here is a list of meaningless questions in physics (that are trivial once you understand logical positivism, but hopeless otherwise):
1. Are gauge ghosts actual particles?
2. Does the electron have a position in the ground state of Hydrogen, if you aren’t measuring where it is?
3. Are confined particles, like quarks, actual particles?
4. Do objects cross the black-hole event horizon or get smeared on the surface, never falling through?
5. Are Green-Schwarz superstrings the same as RNS superstrings?
I could go on all day. All these superficially sensible questions are obviously nonsensical in logical positivism, and to simply study physics, you can’t avoid imbibing the entire philosophy right at the outset, and definitely when you study quantum mechanics. This is how I can tell you've never really studied anything, brainlet.
>That's it. But, as it is self-contradictory, as detailed aboveNever detailed above, and the "self-contradictory" thing has not relation to positivism as I've stated it. You pulled that out of nowhere-- it doesn't even relate to what you've greentexted there.
>Also, it is considered a depreciated school of thought, replaced by modern descendants, see"Oh, oh look at what all these retarded old politicians think about this thing we're talking about." You're reliance on political authority is why you're too stupid to see why this thing works.
>Stop pretending you're a stalwart for something you don't understandThis is politics getting in the way of your ability to critique a thing, and it's rather stupid.
>It's rather sad.Oh I'm so embarrassed anon. What will the others think of me anon?
