/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12512747

157KiB, 1894x1085, Screenshot 2020-12-27 at 19.37.44.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 10:40:59 2020 No.12512747 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12512782 >>12512894

umm, is it wrong?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO anewkindofchromosome.jpg, 39KiB, 303x566

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 11:03:35 No.12512782 Report

Quoted By:

>>12512747
ooh, what's this... stop the presses, I, Stephen Wolfram, have solved the Riemann Hypothesis

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 11:51:25 No.12512883 Report

Quoted By:

Wow Riemann solved on /sci/
Put me in the screencap

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 11:53:03 No.12512889 Report

Quoted By: >>12512928

doxing my own mathstack acct:

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3963320/is-wolfram-alpha-wrong?noredirect=1#comment8173931_3963320

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 11:54:34 No.12512894 Report

Quoted By: >>12512897 >>12512899 >>12512915

>>12512747
0i isn't 0 you stupid mongoloid

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 11:55:44 No.12512897 Report

Quoted By: >>12513477

>>12512894
0i + 0i = (0+0)i= 0i
so subtracting 0i from both sides we find
0i=0

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 11:56:02 No.12512899 Report

Quoted By: >>12512924

>>12512894
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=zeta%281%2F4+%2B+2.3984798773945985769*10%5E9*i%29

give it a second

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 12:00:39 No.12512915 Report

Quoted By:

>>12512894
can you even algebra?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 12:05:12 No.12512924 Report

Quoted By: >>12512928

>>12512899
>@Pixel Source? I doubt that WA would actually be so wrong. Why is it so far off? It doesn't even seem like a catastrophic cancellation or anything – Reneo 4 mins ago
Source is Mathematica, dear retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 12:06:14 No.12512928 Report

Quoted By: >>12512947

>>12512924
Meant in response to >>12512889

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 12:12:01 No.12512947 Report

Quoted By:

>>12512928
Mathematica said your mom is gay trust me bro I swear

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 12:35:26 No.12513009 Report

Quoted By: >>12513507 >>12513513

Just change a few of the lower digits an it'll still give you 0. Probably a rounding error.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 15:44:48 No.12513477 Report

Quoted By: >>12513483 >>12513490

>>12512897
can you do the first step with zeroes? you lose information by doing that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 15:47:26 No.12513483 Report

Quoted By: >>12513486 >>12513488

>>12513477
It's the distributive law. In general
a*b+c*b= (a+c)*b

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 15:48:47 No.12513486 Report

Quoted By: >>12513508

>>12513483
I know but... does it actually make sense done with zeroes? I think you lose information.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 15:49:39 No.12513488 Report

Quoted By:

>>12513483
Are you sure? Got a peer-reviewed study with p=0.05 for that?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 15:50:26 No.12513490 Report

Quoted By: >>12513493 >>12513496

>>12513477
>0*2 = 0 is false
>you lose information

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 15:51:25 No.12513493 Report

Quoted By: >>12513501

>>12513490
it's not the same thing retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 15:53:09 No.12513496 Report

Quoted By:

>>12513490
it's more like (0*x+0*x) = 0*x

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 15:56:07 No.12513501 Report

Quoted By: >>12513506

>>12513493
0*2 = 0 is not the same thing as 0i = 0?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 15:59:33 No.12513506 Report

Quoted By: >>12513511 >>12513512

>>12513501
yes, 0*2 = 0 is the same as 0i = 0... but I suspect that (0+0)*x = 0*x is not the same as (0+0)*x = 0

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 15:59:40 No.12513507 Report

Quoted By:

>>12513009
>Probably a rounding error
Yeah, something like that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 16:00:44 No.12513508 Report

Quoted By:

>>12513486
Yes, the distributive law holds for any values of a, b and c.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 16:02:47 No.12513511 Report

Quoted By: >>12513520

>>12513506
What does it mean for two equalities to be "the same"?
(0+0)x = 0x, and 0x = 0, so (0+0)x = 0.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 16:02:49 No.12513512 Report

Quoted By: >>12513520

>>12513506
(0+0)*x = 0
0*x = 0
it's the same

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 16:02:50 No.12513513 Report

Quoted By:

>>12513009
OP btfo

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Dec 2020 16:05:26 No.12513520 Report

Quoted By:

>>12513511
>>12513512
seems logic, I had the doubt because I remembered sometimes with fractions collecting zeroes together resulted in a loss of information.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches