>>12505205Just to follow up on my previous reply (
>>12505483), like I said I never said these things aren't bad. I even explicitly addressed the point in my post where I said
> And I know SJWs are really bad at critical thinking and they always misinterpret and misconstrue other perspectives, so I want to be very clear about this: I myself am a leftist and I absolutely agree that we can and should question the usage of chemical fertilizers and we can and should scrutinize big corporations that work in farming and agriculture>we can and should question the usage of chemical fertilizers and we can and should scrutinize big corporations that work in farming and agricultureI don't understand why people so readily misrepresent and misconstrue other peoples statements. Given that I explicitly said that we should question the usage of chemical fertilizers, I don't know how you drew the conclusion that I was claiming that fertilizers are perfectly fine, they we should not scrutinize their usage, and that all of the other things I mentioned are good. It seems like you either
-don't speak English fluently
-You're too emotionally involved with the topic and that is clouding your judgement and interfering with you ability to understand nuanced positions, or
-You're intentionally misinterpreting my post.
I was just making the argument that all of these products and organizations, the USDA, FDA, Monsanto, Purdue Pharma, fertilizers, vaccines, etc should be questioned, not just Monsanto, and somehow you interpret that as me saying that none of these thing should be questioned and scrutinized.
