>>12498051>>FRBs mystery solved>Wrong, we know nothing about how they form.Read the rest of that tile or watch the video - it's clarified that questions remain. However that we know "nothing" about how they form seems to be wrong as of now.
>>2nd (((discovery)))>Not even a discovery, we already know both those things, and it says nothing new about how they interactIn the video it's clarified better. Had to keep it short. E.g. they show how with a new model.
>> heat makes ice melt>No shit, nothing new hereWhere are you reading that?
>> fat fucks get healthier when given good food>no shitDid you even read it? It's not about them getting healthier it's about the difference between the 3 groups of which not just 1 was eating healthy. Also they were just moderately obese.
>> not possible, if it isn't creating O2 it isn't photosynthesis>nigger faggotWell "rather than" may be worded a bit problematic there. Without the synergistic bacterial coat they produce O2 and H2.
>> solved>90% is not solver, retardsIndeed - that's also clarified in the rest of the text and better in the video.
>>retards fix their data>not a discovery fucking hellIt doesn't have to be a "discovery". And the important part is what that meant for the study authors' conclusions. It's more about their preprint.
>> sperg of results>fucking hell why even include such short descriptionsWhy not? If interested further you can then check the sources.
