>>12493617But he's right. If some PC mouse company, or beamer company, figures out how to design the circuitry in a mouse to have more power efficient leds or whatever, then it's not killing related.
So
>any technological advancementclearly just doesn't apply.
You can make a case that the US spends absurd amounts of money to govern the world (while keeping their own citizens at the bare minimum) and war time often means time of technological progress, but that's a different formulation
