I was just reading this article:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636190/
and reading this line:
"Lead is one of the most toxic heavy metals to living beings. In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that lead compounds are not directly genotoxic, but may cause genetic damage through various indirect mechanisms. These include inhibition of DNA synthesis and repair, oxidative damage, and interaction with DNA-binding proteins and tumor suppressor proteins (1, 2). Tests for genotoxicity have indicated that lead compounds cause chromosomal damage, induce chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei, and increased SCE (3, 4). "
made me think of you guys. Because I've tried in vain to get the point across to you people that something doesn't need to be capable of directly "breaking bonds" to have an effect, damage DNA, or to facilitate tumor formation and promotion, I figured I would just post this. Even though I've said this repeatedly and posted countless articles showing increases in oxidative and nitrosative stress, lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, ultrastructural changes, and cell death, along with potential primary mechanisms, it seems like I'm speaking to a wall. So there it is. Carcinogen without having to whoa Ugga Wugga me grab club and go after thing and SMASH, if no sharp teeth or club to smash, Ugaa safe. Duhhh.
More info for the curious and non-retarded (even the shills can read it):
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/dj875cd10yb72/EMF
Have a nice day.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4636190/
and reading this line:
"Lead is one of the most toxic heavy metals to living beings. In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that lead compounds are not directly genotoxic, but may cause genetic damage through various indirect mechanisms. These include inhibition of DNA synthesis and repair, oxidative damage, and interaction with DNA-binding proteins and tumor suppressor proteins (1, 2). Tests for genotoxicity have indicated that lead compounds cause chromosomal damage, induce chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei, and increased SCE (3, 4). "
made me think of you guys. Because I've tried in vain to get the point across to you people that something doesn't need to be capable of directly "breaking bonds" to have an effect, damage DNA, or to facilitate tumor formation and promotion, I figured I would just post this. Even though I've said this repeatedly and posted countless articles showing increases in oxidative and nitrosative stress, lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, ultrastructural changes, and cell death, along with potential primary mechanisms, it seems like I'm speaking to a wall. So there it is. Carcinogen without having to whoa Ugga Wugga me grab club and go after thing and SMASH, if no sharp teeth or club to smash, Ugaa safe. Duhhh.
More info for the curious and non-retarded (even the shills can read it):
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/dj875cd10yb72/EMF
Have a nice day.
