>>12486377>it's because dumping a bunch of a substance into our atmosphere that we 100% know will change the weather is very dangerous.Faggot, we're talking about less than 2 tg of scatterer each year. This is a third the size of the 1991 eruption of Mt. Pinatubov- and done in a controlled, measured way, unlike a sudden volcanic injection. Did the world end in 1991?
>We don't entirely know what will happen and it could go swimmingly and produce a perfect temperate climate for humans. We do know exactly what will happen on account of our knowledge of atmospheric chemistry and radiative transfer, and validations of that knowledge following volcanic eruptions.
>Or it could trigger an ice age. Snowpiercer was retarded. 150 nm particles have a stratospheric lifetime of 2 years. Any climate impact of injection decays to nothing over two years.
>Or it could cause some weird third order reaction in the upper atmosphere that causes massive torrential rain followed by heating as all the clouds have disappeared from the sky. As occurred following the injection of 60 Tg SO2 from Tambora in 1816 (20 times more mass than geoengineering)? Oh wait, that didn't happen.
>It's frustrating how little people actually know about how climate science works yet still think they have the chops to opineI agree with you on this point wholeheartedly. It's like you suffer from the superposition of Dunning-Kruger and Tay-Sachs
