>>12478996How much and well it is able to teach something, that the receiver can directly apply in this world or in his thinking towards the betterement of this world in order to maximise the removal of suffering (utilitarianism).
This atleast is an adequate way of telling good art from bad. Ofcourse we can jump into the endless discussion of what is what (for example what is pleasure, what is "better", etc.), but that would be unnecessary. Every philosopher understands that Hayao Miyazaki had much more to say (in the light of said 'human betterement') than Walt Disney.
