Why havent we talked about Proxima d?
No.12471700 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>12471721 >>12471724
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2005.12114v1.pdf
>We find evidence for a second short period
signal with a period of 5.15 days and a semi-amplitude of 0.4m·s?1. If caused by a planetary companion, it would correspond to a minimum mass of 0.29 ± 0.08 M? at an orbital distance of 0.02895 ± 0.00022 AU, with an equilibrium temperature of 330 ± 30 K
10-20% of the planet would be 0-45 celcius and temperatures on the night side no colder than -20 Celsius. given this planet likely has a thick abiotic oxygen atmosphere why haven't we discussed colonising it?
>We find evidence for a second short period
signal with a period of 5.15 days and a semi-amplitude of 0.4m·s?1. If caused by a planetary companion, it would correspond to a minimum mass of 0.29 ± 0.08 M? at an orbital distance of 0.02895 ± 0.00022 AU, with an equilibrium temperature of 330 ± 30 K
10-20% of the planet would be 0-45 celcius and temperatures on the night side no colder than -20 Celsius. given this planet likely has a thick abiotic oxygen atmosphere why haven't we discussed colonising it?
