>>12471084>It's widespread expirimental verification is evidence that it is a good approximation of the nature of realityTake the claim "simultaneity is relative", for example. That is either true or false. If false, it is not an "approximation of the nature of reality", it is simply false, regardless of the fact that the theory that led to the conclusion (relativity theory) provides a useful mathematical framework for some applications.
Is the mathematical framework of SRT/GRT a good approximation? Yes.
Is SRT/GRT as a whole (including the claims such as relativity of simultaneity) a good approximation? No.
>Newtonian mechanics is not pseudoscienceCorrect because, unlike SRT/GRT, retard scientists don't pretend it is the objective ultimate truth.
>Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (maybe)>maybe 
