>>12471017Depends on the starting point and goal somewhat.
But outside of intelligent society, just being the loudest, most stupid idiot and constantly spewing whatever propaganda the news spread works great. Just remember to NEVER use logic. If people challenge your points, just ridicule or insult them. Basically /pol, except you'd be quoting CNN instead of Trump.
Among more intelligent people, it gets harder, as you have to act as above for topics they don't know much about, while being perfectly logical everywhere else.
Ex., when talking to a mathematician, you shouldn't claim 2+2=4 (unless you're specifically talking about arabic numerals and 1D decimal system). But talking logically about vaccinations will get you shunned, while spouting the same old "all vaccinations are 100% safe" bullshit will be accepted without questions.
Meanwhile, talking to people working in vaccine development (As I am), you'd probably hear about denguevaxia (5 times as lethal as the denguefever it protects against) or something similiar and end up looking like a retard, while saying "2+2=4" would make people think of you as a scientifically minded person (if it's in response to the blm 2+2=5 claim, of course - otherwise, you'd look like you're fresh out of primary school).
