>>12467643>Dehumanizing people due to having half the face covered up, removing social interactionsIn what kind of fucking dream world are you living?
>eat shit, you are either blind or willfully ignorantFantastic comeback. Tell me, is "the left" in the room with you now?
>Don't put words into my mouthYou argued with death rate two posts ago. Deny that now?
>harm being done by pushing vaccinesWhat harm?
>and measuresHow did masks hurt you?
>greater than those deathslmao, then elaborate. What harm is being done by making you wear masks when shopping and forbidding large gatherings? Bonus: do you think we'd have soft lockdowns if people like you had practiced physical distancing and wearing masks where appropriate?
>don't boil it down to 30 minutes of wearing a maskI specifically addressed your criticism of masks, and this is what they're used for. Don't divert.
>actually ineffective in stopping Corona. Wrong. Also, they're not supposed to "stop" it, they're lowering the chance of an infected person spreading the disease.
>Don't compare vaccines used for decades that are proven to be safe and to work with this haphazardly created corona oneThen take the 62% AZ one if you don't believe the data. Or none at all. Nobody's making you.
>how do you know I ridiculed anti-vaxxers?Everyone did. And now, a huge chunk of people pops up doing the opposite.
>Based on your writing style and way of arguinglmao, out of arguments I see.
>The same thing you are doing to me really.No, I assume you're just buttfucking stupid since after almost a year of this shitshow, you still haven't educated yourself about anything and instead spout dangerous bullshit, repeating what /pol/ told you.
>>12467662>Arguing 'they were around from the sixties' is disingenuous,You said it's new an untested. It has been developed in the sixties, so you were wrong.
>mRNA for cancer and rabies are also NEW:2017 had the test result published. Isn't new.
