Is it logically impossible to create a law that leaves no room for loopholes or for interpretation contrary to the original intention of the writers of the law? It seems that, as long as you are clever enough, you can find legal loopholes for anything. There might be a little point you forgot to leave out that a someone was able to uncover, and now your law no longer serves its intended purpose. Maybe you didn't have the best choice of words when writing a law, or the language has changed slightly over time, and now it is seen that your law doesn't apply to what you originally intended it to apply to. Would it be logically impossible to not be able to interpret every single law ever written as meaning something else entirely that what it was originally intended to mean? What would a proof for this look like?