>>12434981>In an ideal world nobody would idolize him because he would just be regarded as normal.>In an ideal world, people would be idolized for their moral qualities and not for genetic traits that they have no control over like intelligence.These two are vastly different statements. First you say that in an ideal world he would be regarded as normal and therefore not idolized. Then you say that people would not be idolized for intelligence, but for their moral qualities. But you said that his IQ is 95-105, implying he would not be idolized in a world where people are idolized for genetic traits like intelligence. Additionally, you said that he would not be idolized in an ideal world, but have provided no information regarding his moral qualities to warrant such a belief. Finally, as I've already said, moral qualities don't mean shit, when you're idle, which >99% of people with "good morals" are.
