/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12429359

27KiB, 794x558, 3_2.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 05:41:07 2020 No.12429359 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12429609 >>12429806 >>12429832 >>12429987 >>12430051 >>12430150 >>12430182 >>12430229 >>12430378 >>12431919 >>12432142 >>12432643

Prove 3>2.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 05:42:26 No.12429361 Report

Quoted By: >>12429372

Just use successor function

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 05:49:35 No.12429372 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429361
TEH END.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 06:03:23 No.12429396 Report

Quoted By:

Note that 3 = 2.99... and 2 = 1.99.... Since 2.99... > 1.99..., it follows that 3>2. QED

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 07:48:01 No.12429582 Report

Quoted By: >>12429590 >>12429591

x+1>x, for real x
2+1>2
3>2
QED

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 07:50:26 No.12429590 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429582
> x+1>x
Prove it

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 07:51:36 No.12429591 Report

Quoted By: >>12429595 >>12429606

>>12429582
Better
(definition of >) x+y>x is true for all y>0
let x=2, y=1
2+1>2
3>2
QED

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 07:52:47 No.12429595 Report

Quoted By: >>12429597

>>12429591
>2+1
>3
Prove it

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 07:53:55 No.12429597 Report

Quoted By: >>12432055

>>12429595
I define 3 to be the result of 2+1. No proof is necessary

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 07:59:31 No.12429606 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429591
>(definition of >) x+y>x is true for all y>0
>y>0

Faggot circular definition. Try again

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 08:01:07 No.12429609 Report

Quoted By: >>12429613

>>12429359
$3 - 2 \in \mathbb{R}^+$

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 08:02:26 No.12429613 Report

Quoted By: >>12430134

>>12429609
You're just restating the problem. How do you know 3-2 is in R+?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 08:10:03 No.12429632 Report

Quoted By: >>12430371

$\{\{\{\}\},\,\{\}\} \in \{\{\},\,\{\{\}\},\,\{\{\{\}\},\,\{\}\} \},$ and the result follows from the definition of 2,3, and >

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO IMG_5093.jpg, 17KiB, 255x247

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 09:41:36 No.12429803 Report

Quoted By: >>12430224 >>12430769

Big Black Cock > Small White Penis
Big Black Cock = 3
Small White Penis = 2
Hence 3 > 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 09:42:13 No.12429806 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429359
I fucking love these threads.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 09:44:05 No.12429808 Report

Quoted By:

By definition 3 = 2 + 1

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 10:00:39 No.12429832 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429359
How is this not a tautology?
3 is three units on the number line from 0
2 is two units on the number line from 0.
The symbol is greater than.
3 is bigger than two.
I don’t care if this is circler, it’s axiomatic

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 11:56:09 No.12429987 Report

Quoted By: >>12430146

>>12429359
Using axiom if b > 0, a + b > a, for all a in N
Let a = 2 and b = 1
(2 + 1) > 2
3 > 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 12:34:19 No.12430051 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429359
If you have cancer and take three doses of chemio, you probably survive. If you take 2, you die.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 12:53:44 No.12430100 Report

Quoted By: >>12430122

If a, b in $\mathbb{N}$

a+b>a (follows from definition of natural numbers)
2+1>2
3>2

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 13:06:27 No.12430122 Report

Quoted By: >>12430127

>>12430100
>a+b>a (follows from definition of natural numbers)
no it doesn't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 13:08:56 No.12430127 Report

Quoted By: >>12430137 >>12430155

>>12430122
how do you define ">"?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 13:13:05 No.12430134 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429613
Because 2?3

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 13:13:27 No.12430137 Report

Quoted By:

>>12430127
your mother

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 13:18:37 No.12430146 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429987
If a and b are in N you don't need to put in if b> 0 because N are positive integers and does not include 0

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 13:20:00 No.12430150 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429359
In what system? Any axioms?

El Arcón

El Arcón Mon 07 Dec 2020 13:21:13 No.12430155 Report

Quoted By: >>12430156

>>12430127
Nice. This is the correct answer.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 13:21:50 No.12430156 Report

Quoted By:

>>12430155
You are a fucking retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 13:35:59 No.12430182 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429359
It big other small

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 13:44:07 No.12430191 Report

Quoted By:

Proof. QED.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 14:04:12 No.12430224 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429803
based and BBCpilled

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 14:10:23 No.12430229 Report

Quoted By: >>12430246 >>12431975

>>12429359
Let $>$ denote a total order on $\mathbb{R}$ defined as follows:
If $a - b \in \mathbb{R}^+ \implies a > b$
If $a - b \in \mathbb{R}^- \implies a<b$
Obviously if $a-b = 0 \implies a=b$
By this definition:
$3-2 = 1 \in \mathbb{R}^+ \implies 3>2 \hspace{2mm} \square$

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 14:18:56 No.12430246 Report

Quoted By: >>12431867

>>12430229
how do you define R^+ ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 15:35:55 No.12430371 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429632
The brackets are kind of messed up, but yes I agree this is the best one op.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 15:39:55 No.12430378 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429359

OP had sex with three men yesterday, so he's more of a fag than somebody who had sex with just two men.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 18:00:48 No.12430750 Report

Quoted By:

>3=3
>3>=3
>2<=2
>2=3
Tricky Q oppie. 3 does nart bigger than to.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 18:08:12 No.12430769 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429803
A+

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 22:05:18 No.12431735 Report

Quoted By: >>12431753

S(S(S(0))) < S(S(0)) by Peano axioms . QED.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 22:09:04 No.12431753 Report

Quoted By: >>12431816 >>12432563

>>12431735
prove peano axioms

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 22:20:47 No.12431816 Report

Quoted By:

>>12431753
the proof is literally trivial

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO lotr.jpg, 138KiB, 630x1200

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 22:23:54 No.12431823 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 22:35:28 No.12431867 Report

Quoted By:

>>12430246
As the completion of $\mathbb{Q}^+$

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 22:47:56 No.12431919 Report

Quoted By: >>12431972

>>12429359
Axiom I. 3 is greater than 2.
Axiom II. 3 > 2 means “3 is greater than 2”

op rekt

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 23:00:56 No.12431972 Report

Quoted By:

>>12431919
Cannot refute without resorting to leftism
Gg

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 23:01:03 No.12431975 Report

Quoted By:

>>12430229
Easily the best response.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 23:16:29 No.12432055 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429597
based

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 23:30:51 No.12432142 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429359
Assuming uniform system
1+1+1 > 1+1
1+1 > 1
1 > 0
0 > -1
-1>-2
........

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 07 Dec 2020 23:33:36 No.12432155 Report

Quoted By:

The definition of 3 is that it is 2+1.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Dec 2020 00:37:16 No.12432409 Report

Quoted By:

if i have 3 apples thats more than 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Dec 2020 01:22:59 No.12432563 Report

Quoted By: >>12432575

>>12431753
>prove peano axioms
You don’t prove axioms

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Dec 2020 01:26:44 No.12432575 Report

Quoted By:

>>12432563
>he doesn't know

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Dec 2020 01:46:46 No.12432643 Report

Quoted By:

>>12429359
1 \not= 0 by assumption
1 = 1 * 1 so 1 > 0
1 > 0 hence 2 > 1 and thereby 3 > 2

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 08 Dec 2020 02:17:44 No.12432714 Report

Quoted By:

It's pathetic that op hasn't taken real analysis yet.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches