>>12428724>You're asking me to comment on a quote which literally tells me nothing. There is no context.If I quoted him in full or gave out who he was, he'd definitely want to get involved with this and know what's happening. I'm paraphrasing him. If you don't believe me, then you're the bigger retard here, not me. But this is part of it:
>I've actually posted about this exact subject on /sci/ and /x/ before, though I worded it differently and talked about it from a different angle. I actually managed to get a handful of replies, a fair number of which were pretty receptive to the idea.But I know you won't accept that. You probably already think I'm a fag just because I visit the Kiwi Farms anyway, l;et alone take advice from them. Hell, you're probably wanting me to dox the name of the user so you can make an account and call him a lying piece of shit too, don't you?
I just wanted to know if it was something that could happen, that was the intent in both threads. if you guys can't simply give me a fucking yes or no, then why the fuck even respond to me in the first place?
>>12428707Like I said, this wasn't just /x/ telling me this, /pol/ and KF were too. If you got any beef, aim it toward them too.
