>>12426088>So what's the difference between politics and religion at that point?religion has an established set of rules
the perspectives of women can change like the seasons
whats concerning is how much they pay attention to media now. the people in media are extremely competent at shaping the mental environment.
shaping the filter that one perceives through.
women are highly susceptible to their environments because their politics are more about how they feel about something. I don't think this is wrong or bad or blah blah blah. different things do different things.
religion differs because it has clear constitutions to turn to. without these, more fluid types are very susceptible to environmental designs of whomever is in a position to conjure them.
>More importantly isn't it just them being addicted to a certain chemical and only know how to refresh their satisfaction cycle via repeating shit ad nauseum?Life is just one vice or another no matter who you are or what you're doing.
But yes, they'll accelerate until they're sick or bored of it.
Depends if there's sexual connotation, if that's what you mean by fetish.
The tibetan buddhists were transmuting sexual desire and stimulating themselves via sexuality, but visualizing things like goals or characters/deities to embody in this highly stimulated state.
But yes, it's all an "addiction" one way or another.
The idea is to keep rotating, as that's what life and nature does. All has its place, and the stage continually rotates. In life, there is only a wheel.
>I never really speak for or on what is the feminine beyond what other women have expressed joy and pleasure at performing with and for meTrying to put words on "the feminine" is a fools errand, especially when trying to talk about it with women, as they tend to hate labels or rigid stamps.
It's a very existential thing, and just as nature herself, the feminine is not static.
cont...
