Philosophy of numbers and logic.
No.12417480 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>12419182 >>12419568 >>12421082 >>12423041
This is probably the most important thread ever.
And it's not about being vain or how I know something special.
It's about an exploration. A genesis formed from cartesian skepticism. It's not about parroting, it's not about sourcing, it's not about fucking authority.
It's about being convincing even to the most skeptical.
Now I know skepticism has kind of turned into a /pol/tard atheist pro dogma thing, but this is about cartesian skepticism in a true, classical, and convincing form.
First I'd like to say how shitty heuristic indoctrination is, and how badly it affects us. We argue about the smell of smoke but ignore the fire.
We're supposed to just believe things, for no reason aside for "just trust me bro" or by pure intimidation or bullshitary: such as proof by unreadability or super readability such that to read through it all would be impossible for one person to sort through.
And it's not about being vain or how I know something special.
It's about an exploration. A genesis formed from cartesian skepticism. It's not about parroting, it's not about sourcing, it's not about fucking authority.
It's about being convincing even to the most skeptical.
Now I know skepticism has kind of turned into a /pol/tard atheist pro dogma thing, but this is about cartesian skepticism in a true, classical, and convincing form.
First I'd like to say how shitty heuristic indoctrination is, and how badly it affects us. We argue about the smell of smoke but ignore the fire.
We're supposed to just believe things, for no reason aside for "just trust me bro" or by pure intimidation or bullshitary: such as proof by unreadability or super readability such that to read through it all would be impossible for one person to sort through.
