>>12415046>What does it mean when your work gets published on Nature? is it a big deal?no it's meaningless for REAL STEM fields, ie physics and maths.
however, non science fields is hyped by such philistine journals yes
You have to understand that biology is not a science, it's full of NPCs and women who just memorize previous stats and create statistics. Statistics is not maths and not a science.
Through learning history you see that
This is marxists polluting academia.
(HEGEL and) Marx wanted to pass as a scientific be due to the masses being in praise of the scientific. So Marx said he was a materialist and said history is materialistic.
Marx tried to so hard to larp that he even put high school maths his books, and made mistakes, but since the masses were not educated, just like today, they all viewed him as legit.
This from those people that you get ''history is a science'', ''economy is a science'', ''psychology is a science'' and so on. All those non-Stem crappy fields pushed by liberals as a science.
Then 150 years later, all the morons who idolize science and maths from popsci videos on YouTube still praise him.
So I have a question: are you one of them?
