/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12411699

213KiB, 1280x960, 1280px-Graham's_Hierarchy_of_Disagreement.svg.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 16:15:24 2020 No.12411699 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12411764 >>12411768 >>12411781 >>12411796 >>12411799 >>12411824 >>12412082 >>12412121 >>12412220 >>12413107 >>12413155

Ad Hominem arguments are very valid points
Prove me wrong

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 16:44:54 No.12411764 Report

Quoted By: >>12411790

>>12411699
Wrong again pencil neck

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 16:46:36 No.12411768 Report

Quoted By: >>12411790

>>12411699
op is a fucking faggot. seems valid.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 16:50:00 No.12411781 Report

Quoted By: >>12411790

>>12411699
You are not wrong. Look at the american media. X doesn't agree with our y ideology therefore x is less than us.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 16:52:01 No.12411790 Report

Quoted By:

>>12411768
Yes, if I behave like a fucking faggot, my points don't matter
You got it just right

>>12411764
Try again faggot

>>12411781
I'd rather say that X is not one of us and therefore doesn't have our best interest, ergo nigger faggot kike

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 16:55:22 No.12411796 Report

Quoted By: >>12411813

>>12411699
They're not, because you're a cunt.

Me saying this means that either you are wrong and ad hominems are not valid arguments, or you are a cunt and I've just made a valid argument. Either way, you lose.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 16:57:25 No.12411799 Report

Quoted By: >>12411813

>>12411699
Shut up retard no one cares what some pedo loser thinks. Kill yourself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 16:59:33 No.12411813 Report

Quoted By: >>12411844

>>12411799
>>12411796
That is name-calling and not ad hominem

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 17:02:00 No.12411824 Report

Quoted By: >>12411884

>>12411699
You can always pair ad hominem with refuting the opponent central point. For example " by a+b you are wrong you absolute retard"

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 17:09:46 No.12411844 Report

Quoted By: >>12411860

>>12411813
It isn't only name calling. I'm basing an argument (ad hominems are often fallacious) on an aspect of his character (he is a cunt). That is the classical abusive ad hominem.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 17:15:51 No.12411860 Report

Quoted By: >>12411869

>>12411844
seems like a valid argument to me I mean he is a cunt

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 17:19:20 No.12411869 Report

Quoted By:

>>12411860
Then we have a paradox here, because the argument is invalidating itself. An argument cannot be simultaneously valid and invalid. The only way to avoid this paradox is if the argument is invalid entirely, thus satisfying OPs request to be shown wrong.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 17:25:29 No.12411884 Report

Quoted By:

>>12411824
If the person is retarded or acting that way, yes
If the person is non-white the person is anti white

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 17:25:53 No.12411886 Report

Quoted By: >>12412051

Great point anon, by making a case for ad hominems you re creating a live proof of your picrel through the ensuing discussion. This is art in its finest form anon, I m impressed.

Also, I ageee with the consensus that you re a faggot.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 18:36:38 No.12412051 Report

Quoted By:

>>12411886
>prove me wrong
>get proven wrong
Hardly unexpected, but I get what you mean, since these threads don't usually end up in a fruitful discussion. I'd say OP got lucky with the posters and the elegance by which he was shown wrong. Then again, good art can be accidental.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 18:47:26 No.12412082 Report

Quoted By:

>>12411699
>Prove me wrong
Arguing with faggots like you are pointless

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_2020-12-02 (JPEG Imag (...).png, 642KiB, 971x820

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 18:59:17 No.12412121 Report

Quoted By:

>>12411699
Nothing can beat the smug anime face argument

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 02 Dec 2020 19:29:41 No.12412220 Report

Quoted By:

>>12411699
Your retarded.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2020 00:22:14 No.12413107 Report

Quoted By:

>>12411699
You're OP, therefore you're a faggot. Since you're a faggot, everything you say is wrong. Therefore your statement "Ad Hominem arguments are very valid points" is wrong. Therefore AH's are not valid points QED.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2020 00:38:27 No.12413155 Report

Quoted By:

>>12411699
They're valid in competition, nowhere else

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 6CDB025F-082B-4884-A5FB-6C3DCB9C (...).jpg, 115KiB, 682x1024

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2020 02:47:20 No.12413493 Report

Quoted By:

More valid debate tactics.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1606622307168.jpg, 77KiB, 1080x622

Anonymous Thu 03 Dec 2020 16:03:54 No.12415239 Report

Quoted By:

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches