>>12403632I've read the first chapter or two. The information is quite accurate, but I found he often repeats himself. Like he only has a few concrete examples of a widely occurring phenomenon so he just touts them over, and over, and over again, and I was busy at the time so I didn't feel like slogging through it more. I'm considering giving it a second read though since it might get better later on.
I recommend read if you haven't. If you have, is it worth reading more?
