Does Game Theory support the Fraud allegations?
No.12401293 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Quoted By: >>12401319 >>12401495 >>12402314
If Democrats had commited no fraud (or didn't know about it on a local level but were confident that no fraud was commited), there would be absolutely no reason to wipe these computers. In fact, their integrity should be a top Democrat priority as it solidyfies their victory claims and tampering with them for the sake of an "update" would be absurdly reckless. If they truly are wiping the voting machine computers this means three things:
>1) They have committed fraud and are aware of it.
>2) As Democrats destroy the evidence, Trump's prospects for victory diminish rapidly.
>3) Since the judiciary and other "checks-and-balances" entities have not intervened to prevent Democrats from destroying evidence, they have already accepted the Biden victory - therefore Trump lacks the support required to oppose Biden.
Trump will lose and in 20-30 years historians will point out the the Fraud with cool matter-of-fact rhetoric based on the abundant discrepancies and red flags, similarly to how the CIAs endeavours to overthrow governments in SA (for instance) used to be a crazy conspiracy theory and is now accepted fact, even though the available evidence then and now is virtually identical.
It will only be "obvious" decades after the fact, even though we know it's true even as it unfolds. There's too much inertia in the political system to reckoncile such events, the same happened after 9/11 and during the Iraq "WMD" war campaign.
>1) They have committed fraud and are aware of it.
>2) As Democrats destroy the evidence, Trump's prospects for victory diminish rapidly.
>3) Since the judiciary and other "checks-and-balances" entities have not intervened to prevent Democrats from destroying evidence, they have already accepted the Biden victory - therefore Trump lacks the support required to oppose Biden.
Trump will lose and in 20-30 years historians will point out the the Fraud with cool matter-of-fact rhetoric based on the abundant discrepancies and red flags, similarly to how the CIAs endeavours to overthrow governments in SA (for instance) used to be a crazy conspiracy theory and is now accepted fact, even though the available evidence then and now is virtually identical.
It will only be "obvious" decades after the fact, even though we know it's true even as it unfolds. There's too much inertia in the political system to reckoncile such events, the same happened after 9/11 and during the Iraq "WMD" war campaign.
