>>12400415>"As a man it's virtually impossible to find a life partner of a similar IQ / accomplishments as you."Yes that is because men (in terms of IQ) are smarter and distributed wider, and, besides the now inflated achievements of women, would other wise have more achievements that women as well.
But why would you want to find a life partner of similar IQ / accomplishments as yourself? Women are Hypergamous and are literally evolved to be attracted to men more achieved then them. If you found a women as achieved/intelligent as you, should prob wouldn't be attracted to you. This is seen in a lot of successful and well educated women that are completely childless. (see "A comparison of the characteristics of childless women and mothers in the ONS Longitudinal Study") I recall another study where they looked at a female cohort form a very acclaimed law school, and after some period of time, literally only one of the women, out of the large sample size, had one child, the rest where enjoying their cats and dildos lol, i cant find it though.
>You're invariably forced to partner with a woman who's shorter, fatter, stupider, less educated, less employed, less worldly, less socially connected, lower social status, uglier etc. If you're lucky she will at least be younger, but this is slowly eroding.>shorter, stupider. who cares, Men aren't evolved to be interested in these traits in women anyway.
>less educated, less employed, lower social statusIn western countries, women are on average better educated then men and higher social status then men, albeit entirely artificially inflated by feminism. This is a problem because it women would rather be single then date a low status man, but no you are not forced to partner a women with those characteristics but quite the opposite. Its women that have to date down in those traits (but then choose to be dildo cat lady/lesbians instead)
>uglier, less worldly, less socially connected, fatterNo that's just your assertion
