>>12398518attacking you?
i'm stating that your suspicions are unfounded because you are a layperson.
Besides mate, its not even that hard to do your own research and maybe ask someone qualified the methods and mechanisms they use for their study and actually understand how things work before you decide that something is bullshit.
Then you go on and state that my response to your lackluster criticism is "an appeal to authority." do you even know what that means? where in my reply to you do i ever make an unsubstantiated claim and use the opinion of an authority figure as evidence? Read my reply again. youll see that my ending statement and primary point is that
> "Your suspicions are unfounded because you do not understand enough to come up with actual valid and coherent criticism."also nice pic, do you have sauce?
