>>12380941In computer science, laplace transforms are generally used as specific material rather than a general tool just because of where it shows up. Remember that engineering students learn it because it turns differentials into simpler arithmetic problems - in CS, it's used sometimes in image processing but not nearly as much as the Fourier transform. and in probabilistic analysis from time to time.
It's not that it's too hard (it's actually super easy in the engineering context), but that it isn't first principles material - hell, other parts of real analysis (harmonics in general) are more relevant in CS than laplace transforms are.
>>12381069This isn't really the reason why. CS deals with general problems - laplace transforms are important where differential equations are the main tool, but differential equations aren't that important in CS as much as other parts of calculus and analysis.
>>12381080>CS fags cope with discrete systemsThere are lots of continuous time systems and ideas that CS fags work with. All of graphics uses linear algebra but is effectively the studied of applied differential geometry first and foremost.
>you wouldn't have chosen <degree>ah yes, the need to suck yourself off.
