>>12380284According to neurobiology that shit is science.
So if you follow your own premise, then you must accept the data no matter how disquieting it is.
In this case, the science is not based on an agenda but the agenda is based on the science.
Here's a very very small sampling.
https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/research_report_27_trans_research_review.pdfhttp://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2016/gender-lines-science-transgender-identity/(Apparently posting scientific articles from NCBI nature science etc are spam)
And like, I could go on.
But this is a perfect example of the science leading the way and showing that our old perceptions are wrong, but then people like you stubbornly insist it isn't science.
Again, this despite the fact that there is actual scientific studies which arrive at a conclusion that is inescapable.
Had you actually cared about the science, you would have amended your position or at the very least rehabilitated it.
Instead you now find yourself in a position where you will now have to say it's flawed but provide no real rebuttal which addresses say a single studies finding, or say that it's affected by an agenda. And when pressed, never provide, but make more sweeping generalizations.
If you were intellectually honest you'd just say the quiet part out loud instead of pretending to be worried about "Science being contaminated".
