proof of n-ranny theory, let n be either [t] or [j].

No.12362972 ViewReplyOriginalReport
Dear >>12361037 or pic related if the link fails,

I have, with great interest i might add, pondered your hypothesis on the reason for jannies being trannies and have observed the very same correlation. However, a true magistrate such as yourself must understand that one could be skeptical about accepting such a reason, no matter how plausible, as a direct causation to the issue.

I do, however, now have collected definitive proof by continued observation. You see, i was about to reply a proposal for an experiment:
We simply let your thread exist and document how long it would take the assblasted jannies to remove it. Your thread definitely fell under the purview of this board and has not broken any rules of it, leaving only a personal reason for a janny to misuse their powers to remove it from the catalog, which they shouldn't possess, unless what you said were true.
Naturally this is now superfluous as, after all, the jannies got assblasted before i could even reply.
We can however re-observe this phenomenon when eventually this perfectly acceptable thread, too, gets struck by the dilation enthusiasts.

I feel i must commend you for making this connection. J/Tranny theory has been advanced a decade in the span of one thread.
For other scholars though, discuss. Do you also agree with Anon? Why?