Modern astronomy is broken.
Astronomy needs to be classified as a "grey" science, with some evidence of cult-like problems (appeal to authority, etc.)
The peer-review system has been ruined by authoritarians, who refuse to allow anyone to question the ability of scientists to make quality observations with 1920's technology.
>because we have re-confirmed those observations using modern technology
No, you've been brainwashed to believe that without questioning the methodology.
BREAK THE CONDITIONING
We're still using century-old astronomy theories, despite repeated and irrefutable debunking.
How did we get to this point, and how can we fix it?
>6 years after the first comet probe landing, proving once-and-for-all that comets are simple space rocks, wikipedia still cites the century-old "icy" comet theory, along with cometary "outgassing"
>the coronal heating problem completely disproves the century-old nuclear core theory of stars, unless we are willing to throw out the laws of thermodynamics
>the theories of relativity, when simulated in supercomputers, cannot maintain stable orbits of multi-planet systems, for longer than a few million years at best
>standard galactic rotation laughs in the face of Albert Einstein
>planetary surfaces commonly show unexplainable crater chains (pic related)
>etc, etc
Astronomy needs to be classified as a "grey" science, with some evidence of cult-like problems (appeal to authority, etc.)
The peer-review system has been ruined by authoritarians, who refuse to allow anyone to question the ability of scientists to make quality observations with 1920's technology.
>because we have re-confirmed those observations using modern technology
No, you've been brainwashed to believe that without questioning the methodology.
BREAK THE CONDITIONING
We're still using century-old astronomy theories, despite repeated and irrefutable debunking.
How did we get to this point, and how can we fix it?
>6 years after the first comet probe landing, proving once-and-for-all that comets are simple space rocks, wikipedia still cites the century-old "icy" comet theory, along with cometary "outgassing"
>the coronal heating problem completely disproves the century-old nuclear core theory of stars, unless we are willing to throw out the laws of thermodynamics
>the theories of relativity, when simulated in supercomputers, cannot maintain stable orbits of multi-planet systems, for longer than a few million years at best
>standard galactic rotation laughs in the face of Albert Einstein
>planetary surfaces commonly show unexplainable crater chains (pic related)
>etc, etc
