>>12357669If your ciliary body is in good shape and is still capable of focusing between each blink, and your myopia is very low, you will improve your eyesight.
If your ciliary body is in good condition, but the blur is too heavy, you will become tolerant to blur and the visual cortex will stop bothering trying to focus in that direction resulting in worse vision (without axial elongation, recoverable).
If your ciliary body is in bad condition, you already lost range and flexibility staring at screens 24/7 for many years. You will need to do some serious work to rehabilitate your ciliary muscles, simpley dropping glasses won't do anything without proper habits and the right amount of blur.
If you want to improve look into the reduced lenses therapy, while the claims about axial shortening are debatable, working on rehabilitating the ciliary body is good practice anyone can benefit from.
A healthy ciliary body is of utmost importante to reach the full focusable range in useful time.
The visual cortex needs proper tools in order to focus.
There are several factor to consider: is the ciliary body just spasmed? Did the outer part that pulls the lens flat atrophy after decade of not being used? Do you have good eye habits? What is the power of spherical and cylinder correction?
All of these factor are the basis to lay down your path to recovery, the proper glass to use for therapy, and the realistic time required to improve.
>>12357717False, pseudomyopia and lensinduced myopia is a scientifically proven and understood phenomenon, you can read the studies from google scholar. The reason the knowledge is not widespread is because boomers can't be arsed to keep up with the latest researches in the field. Also there are stil schoolbooks that talk of these topics with outdated information.
Not all eye doctors are clueless about these issues, though.
