During the ebola outbreak there were anthropological editorials in many different publications about the challenges in getting third worlders to do what the doctors tell them to do.
Now, the challenge is in every country regardless of skin color and it's analysed through politics instead of anthropology.
Does anthropology just exist to let cowards be racist without using the word racist?
Now, the challenge is in every country regardless of skin color and it's analysed through politics instead of anthropology.
Does anthropology just exist to let cowards be racist without using the word racist?
