/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12354516

1MiB, 498x1389, microwave.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 15:14:31 2020 No.12354516 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12354527 >>12354543 >>12354545 >>12354556 >>12354690 >>12354733 >>12354764

Just read this on dailymail, published a few hours ago. How credible is it that there exists a "microwave weapon"? Or is this all BS?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 15:17:01 No.12354527 Report

Quoted By:

>>12354516
they've been around for decades

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO atmospheric-windows.jpg, 242KiB, 675x375

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 15:20:22 No.12354543 Report

Quoted By:

>>12354516
seems plausible, microwave lasers exist and there are microwave 'windows' in the atmosphere where there is almost no absorption.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 15:21:36 No.12354545 Report

Quoted By: >>12354561 >>12354571 >>12354681

>>12354516
How would microwaves dispersed over large area affect water molecules that much?
Why wouldn't plants also cook?

Home microwaves are concentrated and directed at the food. Hence why a microwave spins so that one side doesn't get turned to mush.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 15:23:08 No.12354556 Report

Quoted By:

>>12354516
>and made the Indian soldiers vomit
They're in their element
wtf are you doing china

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 15:24:42 No.12354561 Report

Quoted By: >>12354611

>>12354545
targeted microwave laser or wide beam?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 15:28:17 No.12354571 Report

Quoted By:

>>12354545
I'm pretty sure microwaves from a source would be affected by the inverse square law.
I guess if I wasn't phone posting I could calculate it assuming some frequency and source. If it was in all directions it would be 4piR.

However off the top my head the troops would have to be close, so like grenade distance. And it would have to be stationary as the power supply for such a device would be too large to package in something that small.

Not sure though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 15:39:37 No.12354611 Report

Quoted By: >>12354617

>>12354561
Either or.
Microwave weaponry seems really limited. I even doubt that you could produce the right band waves to be absorbed by water to cause harmful heating over large distances.
Not to mention if it rains, really humid (like in south China) or if there is some other obstruction it's useless other than cooking some trees.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 15:41:20 No.12354617 Report

Quoted By: >>12354661

>>12354611
I've seen the use of american military DEW to start fires

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 15:47:33 No.12354641 Report

Quoted By:

Why specifically microwaves? There is no need to limit ourselves to that range of frequencies. There is also no need to assume that the energy beam will be very wide at the target. It is not entirely BS, such weapons already exist and have a variety of uses - crowd control, prevention of piracy at sea, the destruction of mines/IEDs, the destruction of missiles

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 15:56:12 No.12354661 Report

Quoted By:

>>12354617
At what distance roughly.
Like football field or penis distance.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 16:03:39 No.12354681 Report

Quoted By: >>12354702

>>12354545
>Hence why a microwave spins so that one side doesn't get turned to mush.
No, a microwave spins because of the interference patterns of the EM waves which leave part of the food cold.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO ADEY-LIDA.png, 59KiB, 499x396

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 16:05:17 No.12354690 Report

Quoted By: >>12354813

>>12354516
They've been around since before WW2. The earliest real "microwave weapon" was the Japanese's "Ku-go" death ray.

See:
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/dj875cd10yb72/EMF
Top text file. Also the 1985 CNN electromagnetic weapons report, which was deleted from youtube. People like WR Adey and others are interviewed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 16:07:40 No.12354702 Report

Quoted By: >>12354722

>>12354681
Where is the source location of the em and I assume the inside surface reflects the em?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 16:13:05 No.12354722 Report

Quoted By: >>12354749

>>12354702
The wave inside the microwave is stationary, and interferes with itself, causing part of the food not to get as much energy as other parts.
I have a microwave that doesn't rotate anymore, when I leave a chocolate tablet inside and turn on the microwave, the tablet only melt at specific locations.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 16:17:05 No.12354733 Report

Quoted By: >>12354973

>>12354516
>Just read this on dailymail
>How credible is it
let's put it like this anon. it might be true. but anyone who unquestioningly believes anything they read in the daily mail is a moron

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 16:20:15 No.12354749 Report

Quoted By:

>>12354722
So it produces a standing wave?
It oscillates between max amplitude and min.
I was not wrong, just incorrect.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 16:24:41 No.12354764 Report

Quoted By:

>>12354516
I know the US has been experimenting with this for years, it is a real thing that they want to use for riots and stuff. Chinese could have just bought the designs like they usually do.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 16:35:33 No.12354813 Report

Quoted By: >>12354863 >>12354950

>>12354690
OP this anon is a well known crank on here. When you say the right words his schizophrenia kicks in

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 16:47:15 No.12354863 Report

Quoted By:

>>12354813
5g is not harmful?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO Pathetic.png, 3MiB, 1920x1080

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 17:09:50 No.12354950 Report

Quoted By:

>>12354813
>Don't look here!

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 17:14:55 No.12354973 Report

Quoted By:

>>12354733
That's why I doubt it. A "wave-like weapon" seems realistic enough, since we have EMPs. It's just that dailymail never had a good track record, since they just make shit up all the time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 17 Nov 2020 17:52:50 No.12355186 Report

Quoted By:

Not terribly difficult to make one honestly. It's usually just a whole lot cheaper and effective to just shoot someone.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches