/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #12343475

10KiB, 200x300, Robert_Kardashian_Sr.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 06:15:27 2020 No.12343475 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>12343683 >>12343788 >>12343796 >>12344186 >>12344202 >>12345039 >>12345048 >>12345285 >>12346121

>smart intellectual lawyer who successfully defended a nearly impossible murder trial
>his children became the dumbest women in america
Do the Kardashians disprove that IQ is genetic?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 06:16:38 No.12343479 Report

Quoted By: >>12343543 >>12343858

what makes you think the kardashians are stupid?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 06:41:18 No.12343543 Report

Quoted By: >>12346029

>>12343479
Because they only made $200 million off their mobile app the first year. If they were smart, they would have made at least $250 million.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 06:48:23 No.12343552 Report

Quoted By:

Being a lawyer requires no intelligence at all

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 08:15:02 No.12343683 Report

Quoted By: >>12344229 >>12345022

>>12343475
I'm beginning to think that extreme financial security is dysgenic in many ways

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 08:16:29 No.12343686 Report

Quoted By:

No, they just reaffirm regression towards the mean.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 09:23:27 No.12343788 Report

Quoted By:

>>12343475
He only had to convince 12 American retards, not a stunning feat. His whore daughters overachieved as whores, no one doubts they're at the top of their niche globally. Kim also wormed her way in with the Trump Whitehouse and managed to effect some policies, an objective political achievement few can boast of.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 09:27:10 No.12343796 Report

Quoted By:

>>12343475
You have no idea how genuinely dumb people act, Kardashians likely have 105 IQ.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 09:58:26 No.12343858 Report

Quoted By:

>>12343479
Because they're interests are 100% social.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 13:39:54 No.12344181 Report

Quoted By:

IQ is a performance test, not a genetic potential test.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 13:42:51 No.12344186 Report

Quoted By:

>>12343475
>>his children became the dumbest women in america
>rich women coasting thru life are dumb

seethe more ugly incel, you will die alone and miserable

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 13:49:10 No.12344202 Report

Quoted By: >>12345010 >>12346093

>>12343475
Kardashians literally became the richest women in the world by not doing anything
Probably 120-140IQs

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 14:01:21 No.12344229 Report

Quoted By: >>12344591

>>12343683
What about aristocrats?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 16:11:35 No.12344591 Report

Quoted By: >>12345015 >>12345038

>>12344229
Aristocrats reinforce his point.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:11:30 No.12345010 Report

Quoted By:

>>12344202
110 IQ over-achievers.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:12:31 No.12345015 Report

Quoted By: >>12345025

>>12344591
Aristocracy was dysgenic when they did nothing all day but consume, such as 18th century France. But when Aristocracy had to fight in battle, the system worked well enough.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:13:19 No.12345022 Report

Quoted By:

>>12343683
There's an old saying: rags to riches to rags in three generations.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:14:40 No.12345025 Report

Quoted By: >>12345034

>>12345015
So which social groups still have a eugenic for intelligence selection gradient?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:17:21 No.12345034 Report

Quoted By:

>>12345025
natural selection isn't the same as eugenics. Today groups that compete and take risks are probably those that will only increase in intelligence and power.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:20:05 No.12345038 Report

Quoted By: >>12345042 >>12345043

>>12344591
Retard, aristocrats were the educational elite during the Middle Ages and early modern age. Financial safety implies dysgeny only in hedonistic societies, such as ours

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:20:14 No.12345039 Report

Quoted By:

>>12343475
Regression to the mean accounts for the difference between genetics and education.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:21:07 No.12345042 Report

Quoted By: >>12345047 >>12345050 >>12345052

>>12345038
Aristocrats were literally dysgenic. Their families are riddled with genetic diseases.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:21:19 No.12345043 Report

Quoted By:

>>12345038
Scratch that, aristocrats were the educational elite from the rise of complex farming societies all the way to the early modern age with the rise of the burgs and more meritocratic capitalism and politics

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:22:20 No.12345047 Report

Quoted By: >>12345050 >>12345056

>>12345042
Some of them were because of inbreeding, retard, not because of lavish lifestyle
Read a book

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO female brains.jpg, 530KiB, 1334x694

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:22:34 No.12345048 Report

Quoted By: >>12346082

>>12343475
>implying it doesn't prove sexual dimorphism, and that women are dumber than men

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:23:21 No.12345050 Report

Quoted By:

>>12345042
>>12345047
Also
>literally
Kill yourself anglx saxonex tranny, you’ll never be civilised

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:23:30 No.12345052 Report

Quoted By:

>>12345042
inbreeding is not inherently disgenic it's arguably eugenic by purging deleterious alleles.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:24:50 No.12345056 Report

Quoted By: >>12345067 >>12345100

>>12345047
Wealth keeps dysgenic families alive. Do you think those aristocrats would have fared well if they had to actually perform manual labor to support their retarded families? Not likely.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:27:43 No.12345067 Report

Quoted By:

>>12345056
there's a study on italian principality wars about how the system selected for intelligence

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 18:39:58 No.12345100 Report

Quoted By:

>>12345056
Aristocrats were warriors before their pussification by the French king in the Old Regime
Read a book, again

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 19:36:41 No.12345285 Report

Quoted By:

>>12343475
Robert Kardashian received his bachelor's degree in Business Administration, which is a low IQ degree. And a law degree requires high-average IQ at best. The Kardashians are just average IQ people who got lucky

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 21:34:09 No.12345935 Report

Quoted By:

armenians are smart ppl

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 21:51:39 No.12346029 Report

Quoted By:

>>12343543
They're lightweights. The superior Jenner genes created a billionaire.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 22:02:46 No.12346082 Report

Quoted By:

>>12345048
this is absolutely fucking retarded and false. humans have on a range between 60 to 100 billion neurons. are they comparing newborn brains in this unsourced study.

ps nevertheless women are less intelligent, we already knew that

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 22:05:04 No.12346093 Report

Quoted By:

>>12344202
>armenian
>triple digit iq

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 22:10:11 No.12346121 Report

Quoted By:

>>12343475
The success of the Kardashians is proof of the existence of God.
There literally is no reason for these nobodies to have become famous. They are famous for being famous. The only reasonable explanation for their fame is one or more of them sold their souls to Satan in exchange for fame. Satan can only exist if God exists. Therefore, the Kardashians are proof of God.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 15 Nov 2020 22:39:52 No.12346296 Report

Quoted By: >>12347727

Remember how Bruce Jenner killed a woman by hitting her with his car then the next week he came out as a woman and the sheer onslaught of pr about female empowerment and trans rights following it while never actually getting a sex change....I wonder who else remembers?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 16 Nov 2020 00:57:36 No.12347727 Report

Quoted By:

>>12346296
Remember when the first self-driving car fatality was due to the person whose job it was to supervise the car's driving and override if it did anything unsafe was playing on their phone instead of doing their job? Remember it turned out to be a tranny and the news media that had been hyping up the first SDC fatality, immediately dropped the story and put it deep in the memory hole? Good times!

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches