>>12343331I'm an introvert in real life, and I said I use pronouns, I wouldn't be rude.
But yeah, I see your point. Anyways though, even with my real identity, so if I meet them first time, I'm silent, you talk to a racist irl are they going to call you a nigger upfront most times? Ok.
But also, I meet them and they have an open identity.
My identity irl to here is open too.
They use their face, picture, name, school they go to etc.
They tell me who they are and their full name. Like I said alot of grad students.
And with twitter, similar, I see the ones with faces, not some pfp.
And that definition math thing is a false equivalence. You are terrible at rhetoric. I just said, "Also, that deflects my argument, you argued that I said/thought something was unnatural, then said how it's also backwards to be neutral on the matter, so nonetheless I provided a sufficient counterexample, you're just moving the goalpost."
That was the very first part I used that. Once again you're just moving the goal post, and not only that, you are being semantically and overly pedantic.
So you misread my Christianity thing. I said the same things about "I can say I'm fine with Christians... etc etc".
I have constantly disclaimed idc about gays, and if you meant I was saying gays are bad because of Christianity no. It's retarded how all over the place and picky and pedantic you are being with my words.
Debates like this are annoying because of articulation being the issue, not the point.
I don't use anything with Christianity to promote anything, nor do I use it as a basis to change others beliefs, ex. What it says in the old test is that being lying with same sex is an abomination and you shouldnt lie with another same sex.
So that's for me, so I keep it to myself, I don't try to use Christianity though. I use it as myself, and if I do impose beliefs on others it's with science. I disagree with a bit of the bible, so I don't use it at all.
