>>12342160>>12344185In a lot of ways computers already have taken a lot of mathematicians jobs.
There's certainly still a need for human input but 'computer' used to literally be a mathematician number crunching job title before we used machines to do the tedious bits.
We're approaching the point where pretty much anyone can just type complex math into wolfram or its alternatives and it spits out the work that would take a trained human mathematician a few minutes.
Obviously I'm not saying that math is a worthless endeavour, just that computers almost certainly will make it obsolete as a profession.
>>12344120Even stuff like this, its pretty certain that we'll eventually have software that can do it all with minimal user input.
Advanced math analysis will be the new data entrist some day.
Maybe more people will be freed up to contribute to the cutting edge of math?
