>>12340209It do be like that everywhere.
The closer a subject is to humans, the less scientific decision making is.
Your data show X might affect a specific pathway? Atta boy
Your data shows X causes CVD in mice? Mmkay, tread carefully tho.
Your data shows that X is widespread in communities with CVD? Oh, nonono. Are you Xist? Do you want these people to just drop X? Have you thought of the ramifications?
Your data shows that by dropping X on a nation wide scale will save billions of $ per year. DUDE STAHP. Have you thought about the children? Do you want us ban the industry that is completely dependebt on / produces X? That's a lot of unemployed. Also, a big pharma has proven that its X-based pills are not only safe, but help millions of people worldwide live better lives. If X was so bad, why are these pills actually among the top selling drug in the world? The side effects from X are unavoidable and are still better than what it treats. Your data is shit, you are shit and a con man, never talk to me or my editors ever again.
