>>12330141>veritasiumI really enjoyed this here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRr1kaXKBsUthis has been on my mind for a few days now. his assumptions about how geodesics could work in space are very interesting.
can the case of relatively weak curvature of space and low relative velocity lead to a phenomenon that can
be wrongly interpreted as an own force (inertia and gravity like we do typical engineering with).
and if this should really be the case, how can it be that the mechanical conservation of energy always is lorenz invariant?
can this be dismissed as mathematically obvious coincidence? or is there a contradiction here?
i mean, we have been trying for over 50 years now to unite the great theories, practically almost without any success.
maybe it just doesnt work because one simply cannot unite those theories.
>Vsauce>3Blue1Brown >Cambridge University Astronomy>Urknall, Weltall und das Leben (german) 
