Is the node-graph interfeace of human cognition we use to think about for example axiomatised mathemathics ad-hoc repurposement of the evolutionary strucures used to think of human relations? There is no reason to think about objects as such, only to think of them as sense-perception, is is a valid hypothesis that the reason we came to think about these things in the first place was as game theory, where if you have two people there is not difference between you and me, but if you have three people you need to be kind to the other person otherwise they will dump you for the third person. Thus, body cognition and self-awareness makes sense. And once you have this its a graph which is enough to model for example mathmathics or physics theorems, where you have math theorems in a graph where one is a proof of another. This makes sense because I know that, or have heard rather, that the maximum level of active social relations on can have is 200, so I feel that way as well when it comes to things I barely know. For example, in algebra where there are thousands of theorems, you have to specialize, and whether you are good or not comes down to whether you can put stuff from long-term memory into familiarity quick enough.