>>12325163this doesn't contradict anything i've said and you're still stuck on the issue of IQ being a valid measure of intelligence
>>12325165IQ is fake and only a measurement of standardized tests. what you're referring to those "brain scans" doesn't align with it--or align with it entirely (if you know what i mean, let me know if you need me to elaborate further) they show things like distribution of blood flow, the way that the brain is wired, etc etc. all of that demonstrates intelligence, meanwhile IQ does not. you cannot measure intelligence with an IQ quiz. you can only measure baseline pattern recognition and standardized quiz shit
