>>12324954I didn't say do away with competition, I said also have subjective spaces of non-competition.
It occurs to me that we could create an environment where competition is a choice.
Competition facilitates a role, and that role is to get us to develop. If we take it upon ourselves to develop and expand without competition, then, for the most part, we've satiated that need.
Regardless, you can have "subjective spaces" and "objective spaces". The latter being competitive-centric.
We could be wielding competition as a game, rather than a need for survival.
So long as people agitate energy and develop, then the need is met.
There is so much discovery I feel we miss out on, and have missed out on, given our objective expectations. When there is tribal feud, or what have you, a contextual stage gets set. Our explorations are all with the intent of discovering something that will help us succeed in this feud. As a result, the way we look at what we are exploring or learning or developing is all housed within the framework of a certain expectation. This is the filter we perceive things through.
When we are able to genuinely study something without an expectation, and without a pressure, but a passion, we are able to see it more fully because we don't need to use it in a specific way.
I'm not denying the merits of the way we do things now, as I said, I think thus stuff needs balance. Though I think humanity goes through different periods of imbalance to actually maintain balance.
All thats required is expansion, development, agitation of energy. The vehicle can be many things. Whatever one is better at facilitating this will be the one we ride.
