So I emailed this to Edward Witten, do you think he will take me seriously? Do you think he can refute these implications? I'm not going to include the introductory or the ending messsage, just the implications. If you can refute these by explaining how these things exist, then by all means enlighten me.

If black equals the lack of light, and a Perfect Black Body being the total absorption of light, and if a Perfect Black Body is equivalently nothing, and if a Perfect Black Body can not exist then there must be light everywhere in the universe hence making Nothing an impossibility.

If Nothing cannot exist then amount of particles within a particle = ? or that is to say that particles are infinitely divisible into smaller particles.

If nothing cannot exist then all particles must take up a definite amount of space, as if they took up no space, they would be nothing.

If amount of particles within a particle = ? and if all particles must take up a definite amount of space then mass of a particle = ?

If absolute zero does not exist then the smallest possible amount of energy of a particle = non-zero

If amount of particles within a particle = ? and if the smallest possible amount of energy of a particle = non-zero then a particle’s energy = ?