>>12326020Psychology is a bit of a grey area but you can measure and observe economics in effect.
Actual economics, not finance.
A lot of economic principles apply to the natural world.
I'm not saying you're wrong, just trying to understand your stance.
What are 'true' sciences doing then, if not blindly following the scientific method?
I'm aware of the shortcomings of the scientific method in regards to the subjectivity and unreliability of observation, but I don't think that's what we're talking about here.
I think Feynman here is talking more about fields which make claims with no basis - like social science or homeopathy, which could be argued for probably the majority of psychology but even then there are somewhat empirical tests for some topics in that.
