>>12319654>The image at top shows philosopher supporting it, not being in the middleWell yeah, he can't be INSIDE the image if he is holding it, now can he? It is a perfectly good piece of paper and tearing it up is going to look very not cool. But he still wants to be on the scale so he stands under it. So he firstly shows the diagram and then demonstrates where he is on it by standing under it.
>Physics, for example, takes math as an axiom. It can't contradict it.That's their problem, there is no need to interfere with their arguing.
