>>12306576this is all extremely naive
i don't think you are remotely aware of the level of global ownership in the hands of a few, and what you propose means less in your hands, and more in theirs
do you trust your patriarchs? i am not talking about political theater and symbolic government office
a reflection of them is your major institutions.
food, health, media, finance, etc. These are some reflections of your true leaders whom don't operate in the the public domain.
do you think these institutions, among others, have been serving your interests?
they are harvesters for their own interests. what you want to usher in is idealistic, and im not denouncing the idealistic nature of it, but the pragmatic reflection in real-world context means you will be utterly powerless to the people in these positions
Tesla came out with these discoveries, these inventions, these tech.
Tesla wanted to give free energy to the world. Think about that. Think about how much autonomy that gives individuals and groups.
It is absolutely, 100% a real thing. It exists and is completely possible now, and has been for a long time.
So why hasn't it been implemented?
Because it gives groups less agency over you. That is the gods honest truth.
I'm sorry, I genuinely appreciate the idealism behind what you guys want to usher in, but you're being sold contextual-fantasy in order to surrender any and all individual and group power of self-autonomy and governance to make way for a system of global serfdom
These groups have gathered most of what they needed through this system that you see as "capitalism". It's just a buzzword that represents a certain set of values, laws, social operations etc.
And now, all of a sudden, communism is such a big word being tossed around?
Media is completely owned. The root narratives and ideas that get passed around are carefully cultivated. The people parrot them and internalize them.
