>>12304668>>12304538any rationalism, being philosophy or science is just trying to turn fantasizing as non-fiction all the made up categories and made up relations between those categories by intellectuals.
For instance think of classification of all finite groups. The classification of all Lie groups, clifford algebras or whatever the fuck mathematical entities all the various mathematicians have made up.
This is a social construct, subject to time and geography. All relative.
math sis a subfield of philosophy restricted to first order logic. mathematicians seethe over intellectuals who do not restrict to FOL.
Anything after presocratics (who actually live as they taught, contrary to Socrates and plato, arsitotle and all those larpers) is just intellectuals larping more and more as truth tellers in monasteries and university, to get a comfy pay while contributing nothing to society, with the pinnacle being the academics in secular democracy.
if you come from the secular humanist movement where the bourgeois hype the idea to the plebs that the plebs should get a (mandatory) education (more or less for free) in order to be smarter to larp as the greeks, (and not the unofficial and very fact that people get educated to make better workers already knowing how to do a job (so the companies need not to train them) and tax payers ) then yes it is moral idea to disregard the value of the education system
