>>12303217EU fags will never be able to explain why it's valid because they get caught up in trying to disprove/understand atomist shit that was never verified in the first place.
Physifags will never be able to explain why it's not valid because they focus on stigmatizing the theory/an aspect of it using the above mentioned "never verified shit", or using their own theories to. Such is the case with every thread like this that will get to 100+ replies containing at most 5-10 actual posters who care about the topic.
I don't even have to mention what particular arguments these types will bring up/speak of, because in the end both will be talking of no use. Will at least be something else entertaining for me to engage in today other than watching seething polling experts.