>>12300457Ok, must admit that I haven't really looked into it as I don't really have any issues with hair growth and I highly doubt that I would care very much if that was the case.
Would that really be enough to get dead/non-producing hairsacks(?) to grow hair again?
I don't really have much of a clue of how it works as I never cared so I might be way off.
>>12300829Yes but what I don't get is why not have a control with a similar set of hair without any medication or that rollerthingy and also write what the "normal" amount of hair is because without any point of reference those numbers don't really say anything seeing as there ought to be several other factors that could impact the results.
I get that it's likely just for marketing purposes but I just feel like it's insufficient data even if from what has been presented it does look like the roller provide better results than the medication
