>>12297219Nobody knows
>the official stats and not a "study" with a random sample'studies' are all you're getting because it hasn't been around for long enough, so most of the data you get is gonna be only based on those tested, and doesn't account for who knows how many people who got it asymptomatically or light and never even bothered to test
>but some countries do total testingafaik no country does total PCR testing, and quick Ig-based tests are retardedly inaccurate; if I'm wrong and some country has massive PCR coverage, then check the data/stats from there
